Which one costs less per use?

Compare a cheap and a good version by what each use costs, and see when the pricier one pays off.

An example: a sturdy pair of boots against a cheap pair. Type over it with your own numbers.

Over 450 uses

Sturdy boots

$0.40 a use

$60 less than Cheap boots in all: $180 against $240.

Pays off at use 321. Before that, the cheapest is Cheap boots.

  • Sturdy boots cheapest
  • Cheap boots

For each option: what it costs, and how many uses it lasts before it wears out or you'd stop using it. Renting? Enter the rental price and 1 use.

Sturdy boots
More costs

$0.40 a use, $180 in all

Bought once

Cheap boots
More costs

$0.53 a use, $240 in all

Bought 6 times

Blank means 450, the longest-lasting option's uses.

How we got this

  • Sturdy boots: 1 × $180 = $180, or $0.40 a use over 450 uses.
  • Cheap boots: 6 × $40 = $240, or $0.53 a use over 450 uses.

Each time an option runs out of uses, we count buying it again at the same price; that's where its line jumps. What it sells for comes off each time you're done with one.

Totals are exact; per-use figures are rounded to the nearest cent.

Show the numbers

Saved on this device.

How it works

Give each option a price and how many uses it lasts before it wears out or you'd stop using it. If you'll sell it when you're done, or it costs something every use (pods, fuel, cleaning), add that under "More costs".

The calculator compares the options over the same number of uses: the uses you need, or, if you leave that blank, the longest-lasting option's life. Each time an option runs out of uses, it counts buying it again at the same price, which is why a cheap option's line jumps. That's the Boots theory from Terry Pratchett's Men at Arms, as arithmetic.

Cost per use is the total divided by the uses. The chart draws it for every count from the first use, and marks the use from which the cheapest option over your count stays cheapest: where the pricier one pays off.

Totals are exact; per-use figures are rounded to the cent. The answer is only as good as your guess of how long each lasts, so try a lower guess and watch the pay-off point move. Nothing you type leaves this device unless you copy the link.

Questions people ask

How do you work out cost per use?
Take what it costs you, minus anything you'll get back by selling it, plus any cost each time you use it, and divide by the number of uses. A $180 pair of boots worn 450 times is $0.40 a wear. To compare two options fairly, count them over the same number of uses, buying the shorter-lived one again when it wears out.
When is the more expensive one actually cheaper?
When the cheaper one has to be bought again, or costs more each use, often enough to overtake it. With $180 boots that last 450 wears against $40 boots that last 80, the cheap pair has cost more from the 321st wear (five pairs, $200), and by 450 wears it's six pairs and $240.
Can I compare renting with buying?
Yes: enter the rental as an option that costs the rental price and lasts 1 use. A $400 machine against renting one at $35 a time pays off at the 12th use, when renting reaches $420.
What is the Boots theory?
Terry Pratchett's observation in Men at Arms (1993): good boots at fifty dollars last years, while ten-dollar boots wear out, so over ten years the poorer man "might have paid out a hundred dollars on boots, twice as much as the man who could afford fifty dollars up front". It holds only if the good pair really lasts, which is the number this calculator asks for.
What's a good cost per wear?
There's no standard figure; Lounge's guide says "There is no definitive answer to what constitutes a 'good' or 'bad' cost per wear figure". Comparing options over the same uses is more useful than any threshold, and the total matters too: as Primer Magazine puts it, a $1,200 coat at $2 a wear "is still $1,200 you don't have anymore".

Sources

  1. Terry Pratchett: Sam Vimes 'Boots' theory of socio-economic unfairness
  2. L-Space Web: Sam Vimes theory of economic injustice (the passage from Men at Arms)
  3. Primer Magazine: the useful, flawed math of cost per wear (2026)
  4. Lounge: what is cost per wear?